|
|
 |
Cayce Health Database
NONSPECIFICITY
Nonspecificity refers to the
tendency for causes, symptoms, and treatments of various illnesses to
overlap. For example, the same causal factor can produce variations
in symptoms in different people; diverse causal factors can produce
the same symptoms in a group of people; and treatments designed to relieve
or suppress a specific symptom often produce side effects, both desirable
and undesirable.
Specificity, on the other hand, implies specific
causes and specific cures. In our modern age of specialization,
professionals tend to view specificity as desirable. To be able
to know with specificity what exactly is the problem and to intervene
in a precise and specific manner is the ideal of contemporary medicine.
Therefore, therapeutic interventions with a high degree of specificity
are desirable and are prescribed preferentially.
Nonspecificity is a major problem for modern
medical science which likes specific causes, discrete diagnostic categories
(labels for diseases), and specific "magic-bullet" treatments for each
illness. The problem is, specifistic models just have not worked
very well with chronic/degenerative diseases. There are few
(if any) therapeutic magic bullets for heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer's
dementia, etc.
Edgar Cayce addressed the issue of nonspecificity
in many of his psychic readings. However, rather than being a
problem, he utilized nonspecific concepts to enhance his therapeutic
model. He was able to do this because he used a sophisticated
"systems approach" in his analysis of the human body. His explanation
of the causes of illness, and his recommendations for treatment took
into consideration the complexity of the human condition and the natural
(innate) tendency for the body to bring itself into balance and equilibrium
(health).
As an illustration, the readings often cite
spinal injuries as the source of a wide diversity of illness.
They note that pressures on certain nerves could throw the body into
a state of imbalance which he called "incoordination." Because
each body is different, the specific form the incoordination will take
varies for each person. It is like stressing a chain - the weak
link will break. Likewise, in the body the weak system(s) will
break down under stress. Causal factors, including heredity, birth
trauma, etc., can predispose a person's body to be affected in
specific patterns when under stress (diathesis-stress).
So while the symptoms of the illness
may be very specific for that individual, the same cause may produce
widely different symptoms in a group of people. Hence, a spinal
injury to a key nerve reflex center may lead to (or contribute to a
pre-existing tendency toward) diabetes in one person, psoriasis in someone
else, and migraine in a third individual. The cause is not necessarily
linked to the same specific illness in every case.
Likewise, the treatments Cayce commonly recommended
tended toward nonspecific modalities. For example, he often suggested
certain basic treatments (such as massage, spinal adjustment, diet,
hydrotherapy, etc.) for a wide range of conditions. The application
for each individual was often highly specific (in the directions he
gave). But the overall pattern of treatment and types of therapies
were often not specific to particular illnesses.
To understand Cayce's rationale, keep
in mind that he was using a sophisticated "systems model" that considered
the interactions of many factors comprising the human condition (physically,
mentally and spiritually). Healing is wholeness and balance among
these factors. There is a natural (innate) tendency for the body
to heal itself. Treatments were intended to assist the body to
this end. Therefore, Cayce tended to rely on a few basic (safe
and natural) treatment modalities to achieve this end. The treatments
were not necessarily intended to cure a specific illness; rather they
were to help the body to regain its own equilibrium.
Even within certain treatment modalities, Cayce
recognized the importance of "general" nonspecific treatments.
For example, in the thousands of referrals he made to osteopathic physicians,
he frequently recommended that they not only make specific adjustments
to the body's anatomy, but also include general (nonspecific) treatments
to relax the body and coordinate the nervous systems. Keep in
mind that "nonspecific" treatment does not refer to imprecise or casual
treatment.
Modern medical science is just beginning
to recognize the beneficial aspects of nonspecificity. Irvin
Korr, a noted osteopathic researcher, has noted:
"... there appears to be a deemphasis of the
specificity between the etiological [causal] agent on the one hand and
the manifestations of the disease on the other. We see an approach
to a unitary concept in which disease is conceived, not as the effect
of this agent or that upon this organ or that, but rather as the reaction
of the organism as a whole to noxious influences.... The pattern
- the character of the disease - is determined by the patient, and not
by the offending or invading agent; the nervous system certainly has a
key role in the organization of the patterns ... [there is an] emphasis
on the similarities among diseases rather than on their differences.
'There are not illnesses; there are only ill people.'" (Korr,
1948, p. 134)
"Reductionist biomedical research clings, although
somewhat less tenaciously in recent years, to the concept of linear causality
- one way cause and effect relationships -and pursues the quest in medical
research and practice for the specific cause and specific cure.
In doing so, it overlooks the role of the patient, and of the immense
and unique constellation of factors in and around the patient, in both
pathogenesis and recovery. Even in infectious disease, in which
"specific etiology" seems established, the pioneer in that field, Louis
Pasteur, reminded us that the microbe proliferates only when the host
has become too hospitable because of preexisting illness. Finally,
reductionist, mechanistic medical research fails to see that when illness
occurs, whatever the affected part, it is illness of the person."
(Korr, 1991, p. 162)
From the above quotes, one can begin to see
why Edgar Cayce preferred to make referrals to osteopathic physicians.
In conclusion, the Edgar Cayce material offers a unique and valuable opportunity
to understand and utilize nonspecificity in the diagnosis and treatment
of disease.
REFERENCES
Korr, I. (1948). The emerging concept of the osteopathic
lesion. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association,
48, 127-138.
Korr, I. (1991). Osteopathic research: The needed paradigm
shift. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association,
91(2), 156-171.
Note: The above information is not intended for self-diagnosis
or self-treatment. Please consult a qualified health care professional
for assistance in applying the information contained in the Cayce Health
Database.
|