![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
THE PERENNIAL PHILOSOPHY OF EDGAR CAYCE Although biographical information and glimpses into his hypnotic technique provide a silhouette of the man, a greater appreciation of the life and work of Edgar Cayce is possible when one utilizes a broader perspective. The significance of Cayce's contribution is most evident in the context of historical traditions. Harmon Bro provides insight into this historical/cultural dimension of Cayce's work. Bro worked with Cayce for a short while before Cayce's death in 1945. In due course, Bro wrote a doctoral dissertation on Cayce's work and a popular biography of the man.. After carefully defining and differentiating various categories (e.g., shaman, oracle, diviner and medium), Bro eliminates such titles for Cayce. Although there were distinct similarities between Cayce and some of the biblical prophets, Bro feels that Cayce could most appropriately be regarded as a seer -- a seer out of season: "All in all, he seemed to belong among those who could manifest only one or two of the prophet's typically many sided gifts. Where some figures in the long history of religions, including the tribal medicine man or magician, appeared to specialize in direct healing, Cayce's was essentially a cognitive gift, dependent on the activity of others to change bodies or human affairs. The category of seer seemed most fitting for one with authentic visions and a genuine relation to the divine, yet in effect a stunted prophet.... I would in time find parallels to important features of Cayce in such seers as the Moslem kahin, the Hindu rishi, the Sumerian baru, the Japanese urandi, the Egyptian honu, the Buddhist arhat, the Peruvian piage, and figures from Roman and Celtic history.... But Cayce in modern America, with no recognizable tradition for his gift and work, and no community of faith to support him, was a seer out of cultural time or season." (Bro, 1990, p. 129 - 132) Bro's recognition of the broader ramifications of Cayce's work provides a context for understanding the readings; if Edgar Cayce is to be regarded as a seer, the information that he channeled can be viewed as representing the "perennial philosophy." "But there is a much more sophisticated view of the relation of humanity and Divinity, a view held by the great majority of the truly gifted theologians, philosophers, sages, and even scientists of various times. Known in general as the "perennial philosophy" (a name coined by Leibnitz), it forms the esoteric core of Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Sufism, and Christian mysticism, as well as being embraced, in whole or part, by individual intellects ranging from Spinoza to Albert Einstein, Schopenhauer to Jung, William James to Plato. Further, in its purest form it is not at all antiscience but, in a special sense, transscience or even antescience, so that it can happily coexist with, and certainly complement, the hard data of the pure sciences. This is why, I believe, that so many of the truly brilliant scientists have always flirted with, or totally embraced, the perennial philosophy, as witness Einstein, Schrodinger, Eddington, David Bohm, Sir James Jeans, even Isaac Newton." (Wilber, 1981, p. 34) Aldous Huxley (1944) advocates a similar perspective of the perennial philosophy which emphasizes the "tripartite" quality of human nature. Significantly, the tripartite "body/mind/spirit" interface is a major theme in the Cayce readings and provides the foundation for the "holistic" perspective of his work. "The Perennial Philosophy is primarily concerned with the one, divine Reality substantial to the manifold world of things and lives and minds (p. viii). In other words, there is a hierarchy of the real (p. 33). But all of these men, even La Rochefoucauld, even Machiavelli, were aware of certain facts which twentieth-century psychologists have chosen to ignore: the fact that human nature is tripartite, consisting of a spirit as well as of a mind and body; the fact that we live on the borderline between two worlds, the temporal and the eternal, the physical/vital/human and the divine ... (p. 115). Man's final end, the purpose of his existence, is to love, know and be united with the immanent and transcendent Godhead." (Huxley, 1944, p. 38) Recognition of Cayce's work as representative
of the perennial philosophy - as an extension of a tradition of ideas
and practices which underlie most of the world's major religions and
philosophies - is essential for a full appreciation of Cayce's contribution.
From this perspective, he cannot simply be dismissed as a religious
fanatic seeking to establish an esoteric cult; a crackpot practicing
medical quackery and milking desperate innocents of their resources;
or a deluded psychotic experiencing pathological trance states resulting
in thousands of incoherent, implausible psychic readings. To the
contrary, Cayce's life and work exemplify a long and respected tradition
among the great cultures of the world. Although his beliefs have
a definite Judeo/Christian orientation, his recognition of the continuity
of consciousness, including such eastern concepts as karma and reincarnation,
attest to the scope of his perspective. REFERENCES Bro, H. H. (1990). A Seer Out of Season. New York: Penguin Books. Huxley, A. (1944). The perennial philosophy. New York: Harper & Row. Wilber, K. (1981). Up from eden: A transpersonal view of human evolution. Boulder: Shambhala. |
|||||||
|
www.baar.com
Copyright A.R.E.®,Inc. All rights reserved. Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 2006 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation. |